Wednesday, 21 April 2021

Introduction to Lyotard's 'The Postmodern Condition'

The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge [Introduction]

by Jean Francois Lyotard

[Critical Summary of the ‘Introduction’]

Introduction

Sir Arnold Toynbee was one of the first scholars to use the term ‘postmodernism’. In his famous study of twenty-six world civilisations, in the course of human history, ranging from Ancient Rome to imperial China, from Babylon to the Aztecs, Toynbee concluded that any civilisation flourished and prospered by responding successfully to challenges under the leadership of elite leaders. At the same time, civilizations declined when their leaders stopped responding creatively, or in other words, they were unable to find creative solutions, says Toynbee. Such societies in disintegration suffer from a kind of ‘schism of the soul’, he observes.


In like fashion, in his Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Lyotard undertakes a major study of the notion of knowledge in postmodern society. Lyotard then concludes his study by putting forth the proposition that, the postmodern era is one that is characterised by a loss of faith in all grand, totalizing “metanarratives”, resulting in the end of all such ‘grand narratives’ or totalising narratives!

Condition of Knowledge in Highly Developed Societies

The object of this study is the condition of knowledge in the most highly developed societies, says Lyotard. The status of knowledge is radically altered even as societies enter the postindustrial age, and cultures enter the postmodern age, and these technological transformations can be expected to have a considerable impact on knowledge, he observes.

Incredulity towards Metanarratives

Lyotard then proceeds to define postmodern as incredulity toward metanarratives.

In the past, when one framework for knowledge was thought to be inadequate, it was replaced by another framework. The goal of postmodernism, hence, is to do without frameworks for knowledge altogether. In postmodernist terminology, ‘metanarratives’ are stories about stories, ‘large scale theoretical interpretations purportedly of universal application, or universal worldview.

However, postmodernism is a worldview that denies all worldviews.

Metanarratives were hence seen as ‘totalising discourses’, which are associated with oppression. In the words of the neo-Marxist Terry Eagleton, ‘Postmodernism signals the death of such metanarratives whose secretly terroristic function was to ground and legitimate the illusion of a ‘universal’ human history.

The belief in a universal humanity, usually thought of as an ennobling vision of human equality and dignity, is described in conspiratorial language as ‘secretly terroristic’.

Postmodernism As Anti-foundationalism

Postmodernism dismisses foundationalism, which is defined as ‘the idea that knowledge is the reflection of truth and that we can discover a stable foundation for it in God, History or Reason’.

Hence Postmodernism is also called anti-foundationalist.

The grand intellectual systems of the past (such as Platonism, Christianity, Marxism, science etc.) have always had specific foundations (rational ideals; God; economics; empirical observation), etc. However, Postmodernism seeks to destroy all such objective foundations and seeks to replace them with nothing.

Patricia Waugh defines this anti-foundationalist stance of Postmodernism thus –

Central to the ‘postmodern condition’, therefore is a recognition and account of the way in which the ‘grand narratives’ of Western history and, in particular, enlightened modernity, have broken down.

Postmodernists Dissolve History

Postmodernists also seek to dissolve history. They no longer see it as a record of objective facts, but as ‘a series of metaphors which cannot be detached from the institutionally produced languages which we bring to bear on it’.

And since there is no objective truth, history may be rewritten according to the needs of a particular group. Patricia Waugh hence says that, ‘We can make no distinction between ‘truth’ and ‘fiction’.

Postmodern Knowledge: NOT a Tool of the Authorities

According to Lyotard, in the postmodern era of delegitimation of metanarratives, local determinism or mininarratives are celebrated, and hence knowledge is not a tool of the authorities.

In this mode, knowledge is no longer seen as an absolute truth; rather, knowledge is seen as rearranging information into new paradigms. Human beings construct their respective models from their own perspectives, to account for their own experiences. These models are ‘texts’ that are constantly being revised. Hence any claim to grand narratives have no validity.

Postmodern scholars therefore seek to dismantle those paradigms of the past, and bring the marginal into the centre, rewriting history in favour of those who have been excluded from power – women, homosexuals, blacks, Native Americans, and other victims of oppression. Hence to most people, this dismantling or the death of the grand narratives, is not only inclusive, but also quite liberating. When we construct our own realities, there are no limits to our freedom, they observe.

And since invention is always born of dissension, Postmodern knowledge is not simply a tool of the authorities. it refines our sensitivity to differences and reinforces our ability to tolerate the incommensurable.

Its principle is not the expert’s homology, but the inventor's paralogy, observes Lyotard.

Conclusion

Lyotard ends his introduction by stating that, this book is a ‘Report on knowledge in the most highly developed societies and was presented to the government of Quebec at the request of its president’.

He concludes by observing that, the author of the report is a philosopher, not an expert. The expert knows what he knows and what he does not know: the philosopher does not.

“The expert concludes, the philosopher questions” - two very different language games, says Lyotard, which again seeks to beautifully foreground one of the essential postulates of postmodern thought.

Texts Referenced

Guide to Contemporary Culture by Gene Edward Veith

Postmodernism: A Reader by Patricia Waugh

image courtesy: claremontindependentdotcom

No comments:

Post a Comment