Michel de
Certeau, French philosopher, who is widely known as the ‘philosopher of
everyday life’ gives a metaphoric high to the activity of reading, by
characterising the reader as indulging in ‘poaching’ in the ‘forest’ of the
literary text!
The reader hence becomes a poacher in the domain of the ‘text!’
Says he,
They move
across lands belonging to someone else, like nomads poaching their way across
fields they did not write!
Reading
is both a public and a private activity: one can be observed reading, but the
thoughts that the reader takes from the work remain unobservable, unless the
reader chooses to make their engagement with the text public, through
discussion and creative dissemination of their own.
In this
regard, it would be apt to quote Terry Eagleton’s axiomatic lines on Iser -
‘The most
effective literary work for Iser is one which forces the reader into a new
critical awareness of his or her customary codes and expectations,’
says Terry!
Well, Iser’s
theories would assume great significance to those literary beings who are curious
to know more on ‘how’ texts are ‘consumed’ by the reader!
Again, to
the literary philosopher Francis Bacon,
‘Some books are to be
tasted, others to be swallowed, and some few to be chewed and digested; that
is, some books are to be read only in parts; others to be read, but not
curiously; and some few are to be read wholly, and with diligence and
attention.’
Interestingly,
Mark Heyer’s categorization of books do such an amazing connect with
metaphors borrowed from our ancestors’ ways of gathering food: grazing,
browsing, and hunting.
In like fashion, to Heyer, there are three different ways
of reading or gathering information, based on the gentle art of reading!
Reproducing
interesting excerpts from Heyer, over here, for us all –
In the grazing mode, the ‘‘reader’’ picks
up everything
coming out of the book. For this purpose, we shall call that mode ‘‘continuous
reading,’’ in the sense that the reader aims to construct a significant whole
out of a long text, even if the reading spans many sessions.
This mode of
continuous reading is most typical of the novel where users have to immerse
themselves in a book in order to create a fictional universe.
It is also the
case, albeit with significant differences, with long essays where the reader
has to master a series of arguments and relationships, like Darwin’s On the
Origin of Species or Freud’s Interpretation of Dreams.
In browsing mode, readers pick up only what is of interest to them through
the ‘‘scanning of a large body of information with no particular target in
mind’’. That mode became fairly common with the advent of newspapers,
magazines, big catalogues, and coffee table books.
In hunting mode, the reader seeks specific information.
This mode is relatively recent and became a real possibility only when
alphabetical order was adopted for dictionaries!
Now,
therein lies the ‘Shavian’ difference between reading
for pleasure and reading for profit! Ain’t it?
Neil
McCaw’s lovely book has been such inspiration to me in this
regard. It’s titled, How To Read Texts,
and is a definitive guide for all of us in the literary arena, to be guided
into the nuances of reading! You may want to read excerpts from this Neil McCaw
delight on our past post HERE!
This
takes us to Catherine Belsey, yet another amazing
professor of our times, [and the dominant spur behind this blogpost,] who interacts
with us through her renowned book titled, Critical
Practice, on the ways in which we make meaning in the process of reading
itself!
|
Professor Catherine Belsey |
This
book would sure be a launchpad for an exciting adventurous
trip down ‘theory-lane’ you bet!
Well,
Critical Practice discusses
in such nuanced detail the basic concepts on all things ‘theory’, and highlights
for us all, the myriad ways in which we locate meaning in a text, and the
possible interface between human beings and language, readers and texts,
writing and cultural politics etc.
Just
a cursory look into her Preface, would tell you how engaging
she is, in all her critical interventions!
Here we go –
Writing the first edition of Critical Practice was a learning
experience for me. New theories were arriving from Paris by the planeload,
giving rise to heated debate.
They seemed to change everything we thought about
culture in general, but there was only one way to find out what difference they
made to the practice of reading in particular.
How do we know what we think
till we see what we write? I wrote the book to find out—and have never been the
same since.
Hope
I’ve given you enough of a teaser or an appetizer to make you
get the book for yourself! Please don’t don't download the book! Experts say that,
the possibilities of reading a book that’s been downloaded in our mobile or on
our computer screens are an abysmal one percent!
And
for once, could you please just forget Neal Stephenson’s The Diamond Age! Please! ;-) Thank you!
That
done, go ahead, lay hold on your own personal hard copy of Belsey’s Critical Practice, that’s up for grabs
on all e-stores - and that for a paltry sum - and thereby motivate such scholarly
Professors of the Belsey-ian types to write more and more!
Because,
as Lewis Hyde in his memorable read titled The Gift observes, ‘In a free market the
people are free, the ideas are locked up.’ Well, these great minds then, unlock
these great ideas for us, with all care and concern, through the vibrant creative
spirit within them, and, for this, we owe them thanks! And this ‘thanks’ we owe
them, by purchasing a copy of their books! Ain’t we? :-)
So
ladies and gentlemen, please allow me the honour of
signing off this post, with Belsey’s lines from her Critical Practice –
The concern of Critical Practice is not our individual
commitments, not what we read, nor what politics we bring to bear on what we
read (though my own sympathies are transparently clear in the text), but the reading
process itself.
Gives
us all the more reasons to cheer Catherine and her
creative spirit! Alley!?
images: amazondotcom, learnedsocietyofwalesdotcom, bloomsburrydotcom, & this bloggers's!
No comments:
Post a Comment