Why
Interdisciplinarity Matters Today | in Teaching & Research
[The
Changing Nature of University Research]
& The Tunnel Vision Problem in Disciplinary Studies
#newspaperinlearning
#interdisciplinarystudies
Last
week there was an interesting article in The New Indian Express by Shankkar
Aiyar on ‘Non-Economists Who Are Successfully Fighting Inflation’.
Shankkar
Aiyar observed that –
Monetary
policy in four of the largest economic blocs in the world, is managed by
non-economists!
RBI
Governor Shaktikanta Das did his BA & MA in History at St Stephens in
Delhi.
Governor,
Bank of England, Andrew Bailey, studied history at Cambridge.
European
Central Bank President Christine Lagarde studied law and political science at
Paris Nanterre University.
US
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell studied Politics at Princeton.
Tasked
with shepherding the economy through turmoil they have wrestled with words to
pave the transition, says Shankkar Aiyar.
Well,
these real-life examples underline to a great extent, the significance and the importance
of cultivating an interdisciplinarity mindset, in academia today.
Allen
Repko et al, in their book titled, Introduction to Interdisciplinary
Studies, highlight the importance of Interdisciplinary Studies.
Just
thought of giving valuable excerpts from their book for us.
What
Is Driving Interdisciplinary Studies Today?
For
over two decades, major scientific organizations, funding agencies, and
prominent educators have advocated the need for interdisciplinary studies.
The
current interest in interdisciplinarity is widespread and increasing in
intensity, motivated by the belief that it is now basic to education and
research.
To
meet this perceived need, educators have developed a wide range of
interdisciplinary courses and “studies” programs.
Interdisciplinarity,
it is fair to say, is becoming an integral part of higher education.
Say for example -
A
key component of an economy is its central bank and its power to set interest
rates.
By
lowering the prime interest rate, the central bank impacts the economy in
multiple ways, economic as well as noneconomic.
There
are also the unexpected political impacts of a reduction in the prime rate.
So
if you ask the question -
“What interest rate should the nation’s central bank
charge?”
answering it requires input from several disciplines including
political science (which studies government policies and international
relations), economics (which studies consumer behavior), philosophy (which
studies ethics and logic), and possibly history (which studies historical
patterns).
The Absence of Contextual Thinking in Disciplinary Studies
Contextual
thinking is the ability to view a subject from a broad perspective by placing
it in the fabric of time, culture, or personal experience.
Sadly,
contextual thinking is not a primary learning outcome of traditional
disciplinary majors.
After
completing their general requirements (which vary from university to
university), many undergraduates specialize or “major” in a traditional
discipline.
As
they proceed in their major, they are prone to develop a silo perspective,
meaning the tendency to see the university and the larger world through the
narrow lens of that major.
In
contrast, undergraduates pursuing an interdisciplinary field such as
environmental studies, cultural studies, American studies, urban studies, and
health management studies are taught to relate the smallest parts of the system
they are studying to the whole.
A
hallmark of interdisciplinary studies is relating the particular to the whole
by drawing on multiple disciplinary perspectives that are relevant to a
specific problem or question.
The
Changing Nature of University Research
A
key driver of interdisciplinary studies is the changing nature of university
research.
Emphasizing
more interdisciplinary research is both financially and scientifically
sensible, says Columbia University Professor Mark C. Taylor, because graduates
are becoming too specialized to find employment due to the unsustainable nature
of department-based hierarchies.
Interdisciplinarity
Acquires Academic Legitimacy in the 1980s and 1990s
In
the early 1980s, interdisciplinarity began to acquire academic legitimacy.
Women’s
studies programs asserted that they were interdisciplinary by their very
nature, which, in this instance, linked interdisciplinarity with critiques of
the academy in general and the disciplines in particular.
Environmental
studies also embraced the interdisciplinary impulse by seeking to pull together
insights from a variety of disciplines to form holistic conceptions such as
ecosystems.
“Your
planet is very beautiful,” [said the little prince]. “Has it any oceans?”
“I
couldn’t tell you,” said the geographer. . . .
“But
you are a geographer!”
“Exactly,”
the geographer said. “But I am not an explorer. I haven’t a single explorer on
my planet.
It
is not the geographer who goes out to count the towns, the rivers, the
mountains, the seas, the oceans, the deserts.
The
geographer is much too important to go loafing about. He does not leave his
desk.”
The
lesson of this story is that specialization—that is, “not leaving [your] desk”
to see what’s outside your area of specialization—can blind you to the broader
context of a situation.
Specialization
Tends to Produce Tunnel Vision
Disciplinary
specialization can produce consequences much like what tunnel vision produces.
In
natural eyesight, tunnel vision means that the eye has only a small area of
focus, with the rest of the field of view beyond the lens being unfocused or
blurry, as shown in the picture.
When
it comes to approaching a complex problem, the specialist is able to focus only
on the part of the problem that is familiar to the specialist, not on other
parts that fall outside the specialist’s area of expertise.
Focusing
on only part of a complex problem can produce serious unintended consequences.
Specialization
Tends to Discount or Ignore Other Perspectives
Interdisciplinarity
faults the disciplines for sometimes failing to consider other perspectives. Conversely,
the rise of interdisciplinary research and learning reflects the need to ask
new questions, try new approaches, produce new technologies, and develop new
intellectual orientations.
We
can never entirely dispense with the disciplines as a means of organizing
knowledge, but we can use them to create new intellectual configurations of
knowledge,
sign
off Repko et al.
Image Source: [Under Creative Common Licence] Tunnel vision imitation by Скампецкий http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tunnel_vision_sc.png licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en