Some Strong TEA for Academics! 😊
Celebrating the Disciplined Prose Style of a 92-Year-Old MCC Legend
#newspaperinlearning
Today’s The Hindu Editorial Article
It’s indeed quite rare today to find writers of Shri M. K. Narayanan’s acumen and calibre. He’s been such a consistent and dedicated writer, wielding the pen for more then seven decades now.
I should confess that, I’ve been an ardent fan of Mr. Narayanan’s articles in the columns of The Hindu for more than three decades now. 😊 He regularly writes for some of the prominent Indian newspapers including The Hindu, and his articles usually focus on foreign policy, regional security, strategic affairs, and cross-border dialogues.
Well, this illustrious alumnus of MCC and MCC School (my alma mater) 😊 – Shri M. K. Narayanan IPS, is now 92 years old! He joined the IPS in 1955, and went on to serve as Director of the Intelligence Bureau (IB), National Security Advisor (NSA), and then as Governor of West Bengal.
This post is not only meant to shower encomiums on the legendary writer, but also to appreciate this article that he’s written in today’s The Hindu, for its highly structured argument and the nuanced way in which he puts forth his 11 core ideas systematically, in 11 distinct paragraphs.
Well, before we go ahead, let me reiterate the fact that, an editorial article is much akin to an academic article. Authors usually do not use the first person while writing such essays. Moreover, both articles have an introduction, a clear thesis statement, body paragraphs with factual support, the acknowledgment of counterarguments, and a conclusion. However, editorial articles are short and punchy whereas academic essays discuss ideas in a more graded and elaborate manner.
And as we academics are fully aware, every paragraph in an academic essay should contain ONE IDEA!
So the structure of a paragraph should be based on the TEA rubric for academics!
Topic Sentence
Evidence to support the Topic Sentence
Analysis based on the ideas presented in the topic sentence and evidence.
And this is exactly the structure of this beautiful editorial article by our illustrious MCC alumnus – the legendary 92-year old Shri M. K. Narayanan, IPS, in The Hindu newspaper today.
The first paragraph is based on the idea of “Managed Coexistence”. The current state of Sino-Indian relations is defined by frequent border face-offs, raising questions about the viability of long-term peace.
The second paragraph is based on the idea of “The 1962 Legacy” - the historical 1962 conflict and the loss of territory in Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh which remain a permanent sore!
The third paragraph discusses the idea of highlighting the need to demystify underlying tensions.
The fourth paragraph is based on the idea of “Improper Border Demarcation”. He states that, improperly delineated terrain in Ladakh and the McMahon Line in Arunachal Pradesh are frequently cited by experts as the primary roadblocks to a bilateral solution.
The fifth paragraph is based on the idea of “Diplomatic Thaws”, giving historical evidence from the past. Past initiatives, notably Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi’s 1988 visit, successfully separated the border dispute to allow for military confidence-building measures.
The sixth paragraph is built on the idea of “Zero-Sum Game” where he states that, recent bilateral initiatives feel like a zero-sum game, worsened by Chinese strategists misinterpreting India’s involvement in the US-sponsored QUAD.
The seventh paragraph focusses on the idea of “rejecting China as an existential threat for India”. Both nations should instead pursue a constructive relationship of strategic stability, he says.
The eighth paragraph is built on the idea of “Mutual Deterrence”. Direct conflict would derail China’s 2049 global leadership targets and India has no inclination for war, making avoidance of inadvertent action essential, he observes.
The ninth paragraph is based on the idea of “The Military Myth of China”. Narayanan observes that the narrative of an overwhelming Chinese military edge is a myth, as India remains a formidable match in the high Himalayas.
The tenth paragraph reflects on the idea that, “India must accurately interpret China’s intentions” and adhere to frameworks like the 2005 Agreement, which prohibits the use of force.
The final paragraph focusses on the idea of “Historical Vulnerabilities”. China's national identity has historical frailties, and misreading its elastic boundaries would be costly, but the two nations are not destined for permanent war, he signs off.
Shri M. K. Narayanan’s editorial indeed serves as a powerful inspiration for all of us aspiring writers. In addition, it also helps us understand the intricate mechanics of formal writing.
Especially for students and research scholars striving to perfect the TEA rubric, this piece I am sure would be a guiding light for y’all. The discipline in his prose style is awe-inspiring!
Witnessing such an illustrious alumnus of our very own Madras Christian College who still continues to shape national discourse with such intellectual vitality at 92 years, is both humbling and profoundly inspiring for all of us.
Viva la MCC!
PS: You may want to read this blogger’s analysis of yet another editorial by Shri M. K. Narayanan, HERE on our blog, from exactly three years ago, 11 October 2023.










.jpg)



.jpeg)
















































